Vaccine skeptic suspects biopharma 'syndicate' had study yanked

Vaccine skeptic suspects biopharma 'syndicate' had study yanked

Vaccine skeptic suspects biopharma 'syndicate' had study yanked

A study suggesting almost three-fourths of COVID deaths can be attributed to the "vaccine" was removed within hours of being published on a database of the respected British medical journal "The Lancet."

COVID vaccine skeptic Dr. Peter McCullough and a graduate student compiled all the autopsy (325) and necropsy (1) reports surrounding deaths that occurred after taking the COVID "vaccine" and reevaluated the causes in light of current research. He had the results checked and double-checked.

"FINDINGS: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination."

(Excerpted from A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination)

"Our topline results were that 73.9% of the deaths after vaccination are directly due to the vaccine – and the vast majority of deaths were cardiovascular," McCullough tells AFN (see sidebar).

That's a stunning statistic that skeptics like McCullough have been pointing to since data on the shot started being collected two years ago. He says the COVID-narrative gatekeepers pounced.

"[The paper was put] through two sets of checks at the preprint server, was published there, and overnight it was getting surges of downloads – and the next morning Lancet shut it down," he summarizes. "They put out a bogus claim, at that point, and said that the methodology doesn't support the conclusion."

Will Jones at The Daily Sceptic doesn't buy that explanation. "It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line," he writes. And one of the study's authors, Dr. Harvey Risch, describes it as "pure government-directed censorship …"

According to McCullough, the typical vaccine study will generally get 30 to 50 downloads. His paper, which he has uploaded to a different server, is approaching 200,000 downloads. That's threatening some powerful people, says the Texas cardiologist.

McCullough, Dr. Peter McCullough

"I think there's a biopharmaceutical complex that's a syndicate working, including the WHO and U.N. and Gates Foundation and Welcome Trust and Rockefeller Foundation and CEPI, the pharmaceutical companies – I think [they're] are all working as a consortium," he says.

McCullough predicts governments that have been pushing the COVID jab will probably never admit how deadly it is. "I think the government is so deep into this, where so many people have died, that they're not going to admit wrongdoing," he states.

At the conclusion of his study, McCullough urges further investigation to confirm the results in hopes of mitigating the risks for those individuals who have taken one or more COVID-19 vaccines.