/
GOP must condition RFK's HHS appointment on pro-life policy

GOP must condition RFK's HHS appointment on pro-life policy


Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump nominee for HHS secretary

GOP must condition RFK's HHS appointment on pro-life policy

HHS plays a central role in shaping abortion policy at both the state and federal levels. That's why senators must require explicit assurances from RFK Jr. that he will prioritize the defense of unborn life and continue the pro-life advancements made under Trump’s first term.

Jenna Ellis
Jenna Ellis

Jenna Ellis served as the senior legal adviser and personal counsel to the 45th president of the United States. She hosts "Jenna Ellis in the Morning" weekday mornings on American Family Radio, as well as the podcast "On Demand with Jenna Ellis," providing valuable commentary on the issues of the day from both a biblical and constitutional perspective. She is the author of "The Legal Basis for a Moral Constitution."

In what could be a pivotal moment for the future of American health policy, President Trump has nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). His confirmation hearing is one of the last to be scheduled, likely because his may be the most contentious. As conservatives, we recognize that this nomination carries significant promise – but it also requires careful scrutiny.

While Kennedy brings a robust background in environmental advocacy and public health skepticism and a commitment to “MAHA” (Make America Healthy Again), his appointment must align with the pro-life principles that define our movement and have been a cornerstone of Trump’s presidency.

HHS plays a central role in shaping abortion policy at both the state and federal levels. From overseeing Title X funding to managing the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandates, the department wields significant influence over issues of life and death. For example, under the Trump administration, HHS implemented the Protect Life Rule, ensuring that Title X funds would not go to organizations that provide or refer for abortions. This was a monumental victory for the pro-life movement, redirecting millions of dollars away from Planned Parenthood and toward clinics that respect the sanctity of life.

The department also determines how federal funds are allocated for Medicaid, which remains one of the largest sources of funding for abortion providers in states that do not impose restrictions. A strong pro-life HHS secretary can use the department’s regulatory powers to uphold the Hyde Amendment, ensure compliance with federal conscience protections, and work to defund abortion providers at every opportunity. It can also help reduce the ability for “abortion tourism” or mailing dangerous abortion drugs into states that prohibit them.

Given these stakes, it is imperative that the GOP-controlled Senate approach Kennedy’s confirmation with a firm commitment to safeguarding pro-life policies.

Senators must require explicit assurances from Kennedy that he will prioritize the defense of unborn life and continue the pro-life advancements made under Trump’s first term. This includes upholding the Protect Life Rule, reinforcing conscience protections for healthcare providers, and resisting any attempts to expand federal abortion funding.

Furthermore, HHS appointments should reflect the values of pro-life Christians who understand that the defense of the unborn is not merely a political position but a biblical imperative. “Rescue those being taken away to death; hold back those who are stumbling to the slaughter” (Proverbs 24:11). As believers, we are called to defend the most vulnerable among us, and the unborn are the most vulnerable of all.

President Trump’s second term offers a critical opportunity to solidify America’s pro-life trajectory. With the Dobbs decision returning abortion regulation to we the people and our elected representatives, we cannot forget that the federal government’s role in shaping the pro-life landscape is more critical than ever. Pro-life policy isn’t just a legislative or state role. A strong and principled HHS, led by a secretary who is unwavering in a commitment to life, is essential to ensuring that states have the resources and legal frameworks necessary to protect the unborn.

Pro-life Christians should be considered for key roles within HHS to bring a clear moral vision to the department. These individuals must have the courage to stand against the abortion industry, the conviction to advance life-affirming policies, and the humility to serve with integrity. Kennedy’s confirmation must also include a commitment to appoint such individuals, ensuring that the department’s leadership reflects the values of life, faith, and family.

As conservatives and Christians, we must approach this moment with discernment and use our voice and right to participate in our own government. Call your senators and ask them to require pro-life assurances.

While Kennedy’s nomination presents an opportunity to do a lot of good with HHS, it also demands vigilance. The Senate must ensure that his confirmation is conditioned on a resolute commitment to pro-life policy. Anything less would be a disservice to the millions of Americans who have fought tirelessly to uphold the sanctity of life and the millions of babies who have no ability to fight for themselves.

Notice: This column is printed with permission. Opinion pieces published by AFN.net are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, AFN.net, our parent organization or its other affiliates.