The closing ceremony for the 2024 Paris Olympics Games was Sunday. For the past two weeks, the world's best athletes have competed for gold and greatness. If past viewing patterns hold, billions of people will see some portion of these games.
Think about why that is.
One reason is that athletes don't just compete for individual glory. They represent their country. Last month, you probably didn't know anything about swimmer Kate Douglass or 1,500-meter winner Cole Hocker. You may not even understand the rules of fencing or rugby, but that didn't matter. You knew those athletes wore the red, white and blue, and that was reason enough to cheer them on.
Personally, I loved hearing my kids spontaneously chant "USA, USA, USA" as they watched Katie Ledecky swim to victory.
National pride is a natural human emotion. In the women's 100-meter dash, Julien Alfred won Saint Lucia's first ever gold medal. The country erupted in celebration. Her victory was their victory.
It's a vivid example that people aren't like atoms that randomly bump into each other. We crave need connection -- in a family, local community and a country.
Generally, it's good to be proud of your country. Further, the U.S. is a country worth being proud of. When victorious U.S. athletes draped the flag over their shoulders, like 400-meter hurdles champion Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone, they beamed.
What a contrast to the Left's push to kneel for the national anthem just a few years ago or smearing the country as systemically racist.
The Olympics are the ultimate competitive stage. The point is to provide a level playing field and see who comes out on top. That's equality. The diversity, equity and inclusion crowd doesn't want that.
"Equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place," Democrat presidential nominee and Vice President Kamala Harris has said.
Think about how absurd this is. Officials would have to punish Simone Biles for being the greatest female gymnast of all time. That's the only way to put her in the same place as her peers. That would obviously be unfair, but it's analogous to what the Left wants the government to do.
A broader version of this argument would apply that standard to groups. The government, the Left would say, needs to give special advantages to certain racial minorities.
Think about how this would work at the Olympics. The U.S. won 126 medals. India won just six. The U.S. population is around 337 million. India's is more than 1.45 billion. The disproportionate result is obvious. India has more than four times as many people, but the U.S. won 20 times more medals.
But to even that out would require taking medals away from deserving U.S. athletes. Sorry, Noah Lyles. Sure, you won the 100 meters in a literal photo finish, but your country has won too many medals. Your gold needs to go to someone else. The injustice would be obvious. That's analogous to what affirmative action and other DEI initiatives do.
Perhaps that's fine in sports, a leftist might counter, but in real life, the government still needs to step in to help people succeed. Here's the problem with that argument: Competition makes you work harder. That makes you better, even if you don't come out on top. The Olympics are a zero-sum game, but in a free market, the economy isn't. If you work hard, you'll succeed even if you aren't the top in your field.
Shoot, I'm not even the best conservative columnist named Victor. But I'd like to think practice has improved my writing over the years.
The Left's woke ideology wouldn't just ruin the Olympics. It would ruin America.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM
Notice: This column is printed with permission. Opinion pieces published by AFN.net are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, AFN.net, our parent organization or its other affiliates.
