/
Western happy talk is a dangerous business

Western happy talk is a dangerous business


Western happy talk is a dangerous business

Joe Biden seems to be increasingly falling victim to the propagandistic efforts of the legacy media, which promote four claims about Israel's war with Hamas – all of which are false.

Ben Shapiro
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, host of "The Ben Shapiro Show," and co-founder of Daily Wire+. He is a three-time New York Times bestselling author; his latest book is "Facts & Furious: The Facts About America and Why They Make Leftists Furious."

Happy talk is dangerous.

It's dangerous because it gets people killed. It leads people to believe foolish things. Out of idiotic hopes and fatuous dreams, leaders tend to believe what they want to believe. That is precisely the opposite of their job, particularly when it comes to national security: Foreign policy ought to be the preserve of cold-eyed men and women capable of making hard but correct decisions.

 

Unfortunately, politics tends to draw those with starry visions – or at least cowards who will mask their own cowardice with those starry visions.

It's hard to tell which one President Joe Biden is these days.

As Israel's war against Hamas continues – and make no mistake, it will continue until Hamas is utterly destroyed – Biden is starting to waver. Biden has made many of the right sounds: He has expressed support for deposing Hamas and has correctly stated that Israel has a difficult task in doing so while minimizing civilian casualties.

Yet now, prodded by a radical left-wing legacy media and young, daft staffers, he seems to be wavering.

Biden seems to be increasingly falling victim to the propagandistic efforts of the legacy media, which promote four claims: first, that Hamas isn't as bad as it seems; second, that Israel is much worse than it seems; third, that Israel ought to make concessions to the Palestinian Authority in order to defeat Hamas; and fourth, that Biden's electoral prospects rely on believing the first three claims.

All four claims are false.

First, the claim that Hamas isn't all that bad.

It's astonishing to watch Holocaust denial form in real time, but we're watching it happen with regard to Hamas. The rewriting of history has involved outright lies – the lie, for example, that Hamas didn't kill people at the Supernova Music Festival, Israeli helicopters did – and obfuscation: "Do you have tape of Israeli women being raped, or merely medical reports of their broken pelvises?" But more often, it's taken the form of downplaying Hamas' evil altogether, suggesting that now that Hamas is releasing hostages, they must be a rational actor. That's absurd and ugly.

Then there's claim No. 2: that Israel is morally equivalent in some way to Hamas.

This claim usually takes the form of suggesting that Israel is "carpet bombing" Gaza or "indiscriminate" in its use of firepower. That's ridiculous. Israel is protecting civilian evacuation routes Hamas is attacking; Israel is giving weeks of warning before striking sites; Israel is using "knock bombs" to empty buildings; Israel is allowing Hamas terrorists to merge into civilian populations rather than killing too many civilians. Israel is being more careful than any army in modern history. It is also dealing with a terrorist group hiding in a heavily urban area. And that means civilian casualties will be high, by necessity.

Then there's claim No. 3: that Israel ought to make concessions to the Palestinian Authority in order to somehow curb Hamas.

This is the claim of simpleton Thomas Friedman, august foreign policy columnist for the execrable New York Times, who has never met an Israeli concession he didn't like. Today, he writes, "a revamped Palestinian Authority is the keystone for the forces of moderation, coexistence and decency." To believe this, one must truly be an imbecile. The PA, from the outset of Oslo, saw the Oslo Accords as a Trojan Horse. Their leadership said as much. Yasser Arafat said in 1994, "This (Oslo) agreement, I am not considering it more than the agreement which had been signed between our Prophet Muhammad and Quraish." That agreement was the prelude to the slaughter of the Quraish tribe of Mecca a few years after Muhammed signed a false peace agreement.

Then there's the final claim: that Biden is in electoral danger specifically because of Israel's war to exterminate Hamas.

That, too, is a lie. The data simply don't exist to suggest that Biden's electoral trouble is because of the Gaza War. On Oct. 7, Biden was riding at 44% in polls against former President Donald Trump, according to the RealClearPolitics polling average. Today, he's riding at 45%. On Oct. 7, he was at 40.5% approval; today, he's at 40.4%. In other words, he's just unpopular.

But perhaps Biden's desperation will cause him to fall prey to these lies. If so, he won't save himself, but he will damage both Israel and the broader West. Because if there's one thing America's enemies love, it's happy talk.

COPYRIGHT 2023 CREATORS.COM

Notice: This column is printed with permission. Opinion pieces published by AFN.net are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, AFN.net, our parent organization or its other affiliates.